<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Simple Ways to Improve Your Landscape Photos in Photoshop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotoargus.com/tutorials/four-simple-ways-to-improve-your-landscape-photos-in-photoshop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/tutorials/four-simple-ways-to-improve-your-landscape-photos-in-photoshop/</link>
	<description>A  photographer&#039;s resource of useful information, inspiration, technique, photographer showcases and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oleg</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/tutorials/four-simple-ways-to-improve-your-landscape-photos-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-3562</link>
		<dc:creator>oleg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=2153#comment-3562</guid>
		<description>I think the original photo was beautiful. Just needed to be straightened :)

I think the new image has very little &#039;room to breathe&#039;, imo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the original photo was beautiful. Just needed to be straightened :)</p>
<p>I think the new image has very little &#8216;room to breathe&#8217;, imo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rincewind21</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/tutorials/four-simple-ways-to-improve-your-landscape-photos-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Rincewind21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=2153#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>I like the original one more too. The worst change (in my opinion) ist the Photofilter. Its changinge the soft lightning from the original one to an oversaturated picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the original one more too. The worst change (in my opinion) ist the Photofilter. Its changinge the soft lightning from the original one to an oversaturated picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/tutorials/four-simple-ways-to-improve-your-landscape-photos-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=2153#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>lots of suggestion for horizon line..gr8 tips thanx

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lots of suggestion for horizon line..gr8 tips thanx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/tutorials/four-simple-ways-to-improve-your-landscape-photos-in-photoshop/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=2153#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>@ Saylor

Thank you for the comment. I do see how the original is appealing and in hindsight, I probably should&#039;ve used a stronger photo to serve as an example. I was focused on the path and how appealing that was instead of the sky, but it seems a lot of people would rather see the sky retained in this image.

However, the tutorial was aimed more towards showing how to execute the most commonly used techniques when editing landscape photos - as long as people can still get that out of it, I&#039;m happy!

Best,
Christopher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Saylor</p>
<p>Thank you for the comment. I do see how the original is appealing and in hindsight, I probably should&#8217;ve used a stronger photo to serve as an example. I was focused on the path and how appealing that was instead of the sky, but it seems a lot of people would rather see the sky retained in this image.</p>
<p>However, the tutorial was aimed more towards showing how to execute the most commonly used techniques when editing landscape photos &#8211; as long as people can still get that out of it, I&#8217;m happy!</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Christopher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
