<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Prime Lens &#8211; Pros and Cons</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thephotoargus.com/gear/the-prime-lens-pros-and-cons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/gear/the-prime-lens-pros-and-cons/</link>
	<description>A  photographer&#039;s resource of useful information, inspiration, technique, photographer showcases and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Eyeballs</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/gear/the-prime-lens-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-22055</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Eyeballs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=1006#comment-22055</guid>
		<description>No examples?

And you forgot 2 other positive things about primes- they force you to compose more creative shots than you&#039;d usually get with the luxury of a zoom.

They&#039;re less noticeable if you are doing street or public photography since they&#039;re smaller, compared to say a 24-70 or 70-200. The last thing you want people to see is your gigantic rig- unless you like drawing attention to yourself. :)

Primes are more versatile for low light situations like a club, indoor weddings and other similar locations because their aperture goes so low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No examples?</p>
<p>And you forgot 2 other positive things about primes- they force you to compose more creative shots than you&#8217;d usually get with the luxury of a zoom.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re less noticeable if you are doing street or public photography since they&#8217;re smaller, compared to say a 24-70 or 70-200. The last thing you want people to see is your gigantic rig- unless you like drawing attention to yourself. :)</p>
<p>Primes are more versatile for low light situations like a club, indoor weddings and other similar locations because their aperture goes so low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Denham</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/gear/the-prime-lens-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-3472</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Denham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=1006#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>I, too, love my 50mm prime, especially for portrait shots. The images are unbelievably sharp and depth of field control is amazing. Great post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, love my 50mm prime, especially for portrait shots. The images are unbelievably sharp and depth of field control is amazing. Great post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/gear/the-prime-lens-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=1006#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>Another &quot;con&quot;, which may not be obvious to all, but is certainly something to bear in mind for someone in my circumstance, is the fact that (recognizing the pros/cons above), having prime lenses for a number of situations which you might be/are planning to shoot takes up real estate in a bag and adds to the weight of your kit.

I am currently traveling around SE Asia, and whilst my Canon 50mm f1.8 did make it into my bag of tricks, if I were to carry primes for the focal lengths I would possibly be shooting at, I would be well and truly over the baggage limits which I already routinely nudge.

Primes are great, I will certainly pay that, but, unfortunately, zooms will always have to be a standard piece of my kit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another &#8220;con&#8221;, which may not be obvious to all, but is certainly something to bear in mind for someone in my circumstance, is the fact that (recognizing the pros/cons above), having prime lenses for a number of situations which you might be/are planning to shoot takes up real estate in a bag and adds to the weight of your kit.</p>
<p>I am currently traveling around SE Asia, and whilst my Canon 50mm f1.8 did make it into my bag of tricks, if I were to carry primes for the focal lengths I would possibly be shooting at, I would be well and truly over the baggage limits which I already routinely nudge.</p>
<p>Primes are great, I will certainly pay that, but, unfortunately, zooms will always have to be a standard piece of my kit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dee</title>
		<link>http://www.thephotoargus.com/gear/the-prime-lens-pros-and-cons/comment-page-1/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Dee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thephotoargus.com/?p=1006#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>I love prime lenses for shooting portraits especially. Thanks for this sharing this! It is clear enough about how good prime lens can be! I have 2 for my D40! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love prime lenses for shooting portraits especially. Thanks for this sharing this! It is clear enough about how good prime lens can be! I have 2 for my D40! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

